I am struggling to build a field that correctly associates Inventory Variant Product codes to the Master Product Code in a manner that will make Google happy.
From Google, it says to use Item group ID [item_group_id] - that would be the Master Product Code. The only time I've used the Master Product Code is when I've created an import that will have Inventory Variant Products.
In the Miva Docs https://docs.miva.com/how-to-guides/...t#templatefeed it discusses how checking Load Variants and
I'm struggling to find how to tie the Master Product Code to the Variants if needed.
I have found it mentions
If I understand this correctly, would this be the place to also include Item group ID [item_group_id] if the data is for a variant?
FWIW - the samples in the Miva Docs are out of date. Google does not like spaces in the field names. You need to use underscores instead,
ps...I'm posting here because I suspect there may be other storeowners struggling with this too.
From Google, it says to use Item group ID [item_group_id] - that would be the Master Product Code. The only time I've used the Master Product Code is when I've created an import that will have Inventory Variant Products.
In the Miva Docs https://docs.miva.com/how-to-guides/...t#templatefeed it discusses how checking Load Variants and
access to the master products data will be available if needed.
I have found it mentions
Code:
<mvt:if expr="NOT ISNULL l.settings:record:variant"> //output variant data records here </mvt:if>
FWIW - the samples in the Miva Docs are out of date. Google does not like spaces in the field names. You need to use underscores instead,
ps...I'm posting here because I suspect there may be other storeowners struggling with this too.